About this role
The research teams behind the best-known AI models come to Mercor for legal judgment they can't generate on their own. Your standards and expertise become the rubric that frontier AI is graded against.
This is a standing listing for lawyers who want AI training and evaluation work, not a specific job opening. It stays open whether or not a matching project is running this week.
New projects start on short notice, so instead of posting and pulling a listing each time, we keep one open per field and draw from it when one begins.
What the work looks like
We match lawyers in the network to projects like
- Drafting a motion or a brief from a fact pattern, plus the reference answer a model's attempt gets graded against
- Grading model-drafted contract and discovery work: whether the provision does what it claims, whether the privilege call is right, whether the citation supports the proposition it is offered for
- Flagging where a model states the law correctly and would still lose, given the forum, the standard of review, or facts that do not carry the argument
Projects in this field have posted at $100 to $150 an hour, set per project by scope and depth.
What we're looking for
- A J.D., LL.B., or LL.M. and a current license to practice
- Professional experience in litigation, transactional work, or regulatory practice
- Clear written communication, since most of the work involves explaining your reasoning
- Comfort with ambiguous tasks, and willingness to flag unclear instructions