Overview
Hand a model a merger agreement and it summarizes it fluently, then misses that the indemnification cap swallows the escrow, that a closing condition has no matching covenant, and that the chosen deal structure triggers a tax result no client would accept. The language is polished; the deal logic is broken. A transactional lawyer like you is who notices.
As a Corporate Attorney you'll evaluate AI work on M&A, financings, and governance, test whether the terms actually fit together and protect the client, and rewrite the provisions the way a careful dealmaker would.
What you’ll actually do
- Draft prompts that test how models handle merger agreements, financings, corporate governance, and deal structuring.
- Review AI output for mismatched covenants, unworkable closing conditions, mispriced risk allocation, and boilerplate that does not fit the deal, and rate the reasoning.
- Write the correct provision when the model falls short, with the discipline of a well-negotiated agreement.
Roles this fits
Common backgrounds: M&A Attorney, Transactional Attorney, General Counsel.
What we look for
- Hands-on transactional experience: M&A, capital markets, venture financings, or general corporate work.
- A feel for how deal terms fit together and where risk actually sits.
- Clear written English: your explanations are the training signal.
- No degree required. We care about what you can do, not where you learned it.